Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tereza Smitkova vs Coco Vandeweghe Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Smitkova vs Vandeweghe analysis and find out who is favored!
Tereza Smitkova vs Coco Vandeweghe Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Smitkova 1 - 0 Vandeweghe
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Smitkova has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Vandeweghe has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Smitkova, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Vandeweghe has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Smitkova has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Vandeweghe has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Smitkova has won 23.08% of matches played (W/L 3/ 10), with Vandeweghe winning 37.5% (W/L 3/ 5) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Smitkova has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 70% (W/L 159/ 68), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 49% (W/L 38/ 39). Vandeweghe has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 70/ 34), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 42/ 52).
- Player level: In the last year, Smitkova has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 23.08% of matches (W/L 3/ 10), where as Vandeweghe has played most of their matches on the Grand Slam, winning 50% of matches (W/L 2/ 2). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Smitkova winning 1 times and Vandeweghe being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Smitkova winning 2 and Vandeweghe winning 0. The last match between Smitkova and Vandeweghe was at the Wimbledon - London, 25-06-2014, Second, Grass with Tereza Smitkova getting the victory 6-3 7-6(4).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:29:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Smitkova and Vandeweghe have played a deciding set 0 times, with Smitkova winning 0 times and Vandeweghe 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Smitkova winning 1, and Vandeweghe 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Smitkova has played against opponents with an average rank of 409.38 while Vandeweghe has played against players with an average rank of 365.88.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Smitkova has won 25% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Vandeweghe has won 100% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Smitkova has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Vandeweghe has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
863
Rank
57
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
1
Grass0
713
Rank
9
High
32
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
59% (349-245)
Career Total W/L
52% (308-281)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$492,762
Career Prize Money
$4,045,196
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Smitkova VS Vandeweghe H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Tereza Smitkova | Coco Vandeweghe |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:29:0 | 1:29:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (50/76) | 63% (40/64) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (37/50) | 75% (30/40) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 65% (17/26) | 54% (13/24) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/3) |
| Return Points W% | 33% (21/64) | 29% (22/76) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Smitkova VS Vandeweghe H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-6(4) |
Stats 
Tereza Smitkova
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
66%
(
50 of
76)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
6
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
22 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
21 of
64)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tereza Smitkova | Coco Vandeweghe |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tereza Smitkova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Tereza Smitkova
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tereza Smitkova
Player
Ivana Sebestova
66%
(
66 of
100)
1st Serve %
65%
(
69 of
106)
8
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
46 of
69)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
21%
(
4 of
19)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
35 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
106)
110
Total Points Won
96
|
6-1 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tereza Smitkova
Player
Gabriela Nanova
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
9
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Tereza Smitkova
58%
(
44 of
76)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
83)
2
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
6
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
8 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
31 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Linda Klimovicova
Player
Tereza Smitkova
49%
(
28 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Linda Klimovicova
Player
Tereza Smitkova
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dominika Salkova
Player
Tereza Smitkova
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
46%
(
21 of
46)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
55%
(
17 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sapfo Sakellaridi
Player
Tereza Smitkova
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
59
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tereza Smitkova
Player
Valeriya Olyanovskaya
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
43%
(
24 of
56)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
40%
(
19 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aneta Kladivova
Player
Tereza Smitkova
68%
(
54 of
80)
1st Serve %
65%
(
54 of
83)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
33 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
44 of
83)
91
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Coco Vandeweghe Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Eva Lys
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
37%
(
19 of
52)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Robin Montgomery
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
53%
(
39 of
73)
1st Serve %
40%
(
25 of
63)
9
Aces
10
9
Double Faults
11
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carol Zhao
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
78%
(
53 of
68)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
78)
11
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
4
87%
(
46 of
53)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
15 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
26 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Coco Vandeweghe
Player
Barbora Palicova
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve %
81%
(
50 of
62)
6
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
1
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
30 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Coco Vandeweghe
Player
Su Jeong Jang
49%
(
42 of
86)
1st Serve %
75%
(
69 of
92)
3
Aces
9
7
Double Faults
3
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
40 of
69)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
92)
90
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Xinyu Wang
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
2
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
6
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Coco Vandeweghe
Player
Carol Zhao
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
9
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
96%
(
22 of
23)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lena Papadakis
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve %
51%
(
22 of
43)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
7
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Francesca Jones
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
40%
(
19 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elvina Kalieva
Player
Coco Vandeweghe
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
35%
(
17 of
49)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Smitkova Vs Vandeweghe Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
